THE JUDAS PROBLEM

What the Most Misunderstood Betrayal in Scripture Actually Teaches Us About Salvation

Mar 17, 2026

Judas Iscariot may be the most weaponized figure in the entire Bible.

If you teach that salvation is eternal—that a person who has genuinely placed their faith in Jesus Christ is held secure by the power of God—someone will eventually throw Judas at you like a grenade. “Judas was a disciple,” they’ll say. “He followed Jesus for three years. He preached the Gospel. He cast out demons. And he went to hell. So don’t tell me you can’t lose your salvation.”

It sounds devastating. And for many believers who haven’t studied the full weight of what Scripture actually reveals about Judas, it is devastating. It plants a seed of fear: If Judas could fall, so could I. If he walked with Jesus and still ended up lost, what hope do I have?

That fear is exactly the point—for those who preach it.

But here’s the problem. The argument depends on an assumption that Scripture itself dismantles, repeatedly and explicitly, if you’re willing to slow down and look. The assumption is that Judas was ever saved in the first place.

He wasn’t. And Jesus said so. Multiple times. In plain language. Years before the betrayal.

This article is not about winning a theological argument. It is about telling the truth—because the truth is what sets people free, and too many people are in bondage to a version of Christianity that makes salvation depend on their performance rather than on the finished work of Christ. The story of Judas doesn’t undermine eternal salvation. Properly understood, it is one of the most powerful confirmations of it in the entire New Testament.

But to see that, we need to look at what the Bible actually says about Judas—not what both sides have assumed it says.

I. The Catchy Phrases That Keep People in Chains

Before we open Scripture, let’s name what we’re dealing with. The debate over eternal salvation has been reduced, on both sides, to bumper stickers. And bumper stickers make terrible theology.

“Once Saved, Always Saved” — this phrase, coined by critics and adopted by some defenders, trivializes one of the most profound truths in Scripture by making it sound like a free pass. It reduces the eternal, covenantal, blood-bought security of the believer to a catchy slogan.

“OSAS is a lie of the devil” — this one is worse, because it takes a caricature of what Scripture teaches and then condemns it as satanic. It’s fighting a straw man and calling it warfare.

“If you’re caught in sin, you’re going to hell” — then every human being who has ever lived is going to hell, because “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). This statement makes the cross irrelevant.

“If you talk the talk but don’t walk the walk, you’re not going to heaven” — this conflates sanctification with justification. It makes salvation contingent on behavior rather than on the One who saves.

“You can live however you want and still be saved” — this is equally false. It turns grace into license and ignores Romans 6:1–2, where Paul anticipated exactly this distortion: “Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? By no means!”

“Salvation is about enduring to the end” — this makes salvation a marathon you can fail, rather than a gift you receive from a God who promises to carry you through.

Every one of these statements is incomplete at best and heretical at worst, because each one shifts the focus from the Person of salvation to the performance of the believer. And that is where the entire conversation goes off the rails.

People have taken sides—OSAS or anti-OSAS—and they friend or unfriend each other, condemn or embrace each other, based on which camp they’ve joined. Meanwhile, the actual teaching of Scripture is richer, deeper, and more nuanced than either side wants to admit. And the story of Judas sits at the center of that tension.

So let’s actually look at it.

II. What Jesus Said About Judas That Most People Skip

If you build your theology of Judas from the betrayal scene alone—the kiss in Gethsemane, the thirty pieces of silver, the hanging—you will misunderstand everything. The betrayal is the final act of a story that Jesus narrated long before it happened. And what He said, explicitly and repeatedly, is that Judas was never a genuine believer.

“Some of you do not believe”

“But there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe, and who would betray Him.” — John 6:64

Note the tense. Jesus does not say “some of you will stop believing.” He says “some of you do not believe”—present tense. And John’s editorial comment is devastating: Jesus had known this “from the beginning.” Not from the betrayal. From the beginning. Judas never believed. Jesus always knew it.

“One of you is a devil”

“Did I Myself not choose you, the twelve, and yet one of you is a devil?” — John 6:70

This was spoken publicly, in front of the twelve, roughly a year before the crucifixion. Jesus is not saying Judas became a devil. He is saying Judas is one. Present tense. The Greek word is diabolos—slanderer, adversary. Jesus chose Judas knowing exactly what he was. That choice was not a mistake. It was sovereign.

“You are clean, but not all of you”

“Jesus said to him, ‘He who has bathed needs only to wash his feet, but is completely clean; and you are clean, but not all of you.’ For He knew the one who was betraying Him; for this reason He said, ‘Not all of you are clean.’” — John 13:10–11

At the Last Supper, Jesus washes the disciples’ feet—including Judas’s. Then He makes a distinction. The eleven are “clean”—a word that in John’s Gospel carries deep spiritual meaning. They have been washed. Their sins are forgiven. They belong to Christ. But “not all of you.” Judas is specifically excluded. He is not clean. He has not been washed. He does not belong.

And yet—and this is crucial—Jesus still washed his feet. He still knelt before the man He knew would betray Him and performed an act of humble, intimate service. That is not the posture of a God who has given up on someone. That is the posture of a God still reaching out to the very end.

“I know whom I have chosen”

“I do not speak of all of you. I know the ones I have chosen; but it is that the Scripture may be fulfilled, ‘He who eats My bread has lifted up his heel against Me.’” — John 13:18

Jesus makes it clear: what He is saying about blessing, service, and intimacy applies to those He has chosen—and Judas is not among them. Not because Jesus rejected Judas, but because Judas never chose Jesus. Judas chose the movement, the miracles, the money bag. He never chose the Man.

“None has been lost except the son of perdition”

“While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given Me; and I guarded them and not one of them perished but the son of perdition, so that the Scripture would be fulfilled.” — John 17:12

This is Jesus praying to the Father in John 17—the High Priestly Prayer, the most intimate prayer recorded in Scripture. Jesus says He has guarded every one that the Father gave Him. Not one has perished. But Judas—“the son of perdition”—was never one of those given. He was not lost from the fold. He was never in it. The phrase “son of perdition” (huios tes apoleias) means one destined for destruction, one whose nature is defined by lostness. Judas did not fall from grace. He was never under it.

The Thief from the Beginning

“He said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief; as he had the money box, he used to pilfer what was put into it.” — John 12:6

John reveals Judas’s true character: a thief who stole from the ministry’s funds from the beginning. Not a believer who fell into sin, but a man whose heart was never aligned with Jesus. He was attached to what Jesus could provide—proximity to power, a seat at the table, access to the money—but never attached to Jesus Himself.

They Went Out Because They Were Never Of Us

“They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not of us.”— 1 John 2:19

Although John wrote this decades later, it reads like a commentary on Judas’s departure from the Upper Room. Those who leave were never truly part of the body. Their departure doesn’t prove that believers can fall away. It reveals that some who appeared to be believers never were.

When you stack these passages together, the picture is not ambiguous. Jesus knew Judas didn’t believe—from the beginning. Jesus called him a devil—while he was still at the table. Jesus excluded him from those who were “clean.” Jesus told the Father that Judas was never among those given to Him. John tells us Judas was a thief all along. And John later writes that departure from the community reveals that someone was never genuinely part of it.

Judas was not a saved man who lost his salvation. He was an unsaved man who looked like a disciple. And that distinction changes everything.

III. The Hidden Truth: Judas Wanted a Kingdom, Not a King

Here is the part of the story that almost nobody talks about, and it is the key that unlocks the entire meaning of Judas’s betrayal.

Judas didn’t betray Jesus because he hated Him. He betrayed Jesus because Jesus wasn’t the Messiah Judas wanted.

To understand this, you have to understand what first-century Jews expected from their Messiah. They were looking for a political liberator—a warrior-king in the mold of David who would overthrow Roman occupation, restore the throne of Israel, and establish a physical kingdom. This was not a fringe expectation. It was the dominant expectation. Even the other disciples struggled with it. In Acts 1:6, after the resurrection, they were still asking: “Lord, are You at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?”

Judas appears to have been the most politically motivated of the twelve. His surname, “Iscariot,” has been the subject of scholarly debate, but one widely discussed theory connects it to the Latin sicarius—a dagger-man, an assassin, a member of the radical Zealot faction that sought violent revolution against Rome. Whether or not that etymology is correct, Judas’s actions tell the story: he was in it for the kingdom, not the King.

Think about what Judas witnessed. He saw Jesus multiply bread, walk on water, heal the blind, and raise the dead. He heard the crowds shout “Hosanna!” on Palm Sunday. He watched the triumphal entry into Jerusalem and must have thought: This is it. The revolution is finally here.

But then Jesus didn’t seize power. He didn’t rally an army. He didn’t storm the temple with a sword. Instead, He started talking about suffering, death, and a kingdom that was “not of this world.” He let a woman pour expensive perfume on His feet when that money could have funded the cause—and Judas objected (John 12:4–6). He knelt and washed feet like a servant. He spoke of His body being broken and His blood being poured out.

This was not the Messiah Judas signed up for.

Many scholars believe Judas’s betrayal was not an act of hatred but an act of manipulation. By handing Jesus over to the authorities, Judas may have been trying to force Jesus’s hand—to create a crisis that would compel Jesus to unleash His power, overthrow the religious establishment, and finally establish the kingdom Judas had been waiting for. If Jesus could raise the dead, surely He could defeat a few temple guards.

But Jesus didn’t fight. He submitted. And when Judas saw that Jesus had been condemned—that His plan had backfired catastrophically—he was seized not with repentance but with horror at what he had done.

The hidden truth of Judas is this: he was never transformed by Jesus because he never surrendered to Jesus. He followed Jesus for three years, saw every miracle, heard every sermon, sat at every meal—and his heart never changed. He wanted what Jesus could do. He never wanted who Jesus was.

And that is the most terrifying lesson of Judas’s life. Not that a believer can lose salvation. But that proximity to Jesus is not the same as possession of Jesus. You can sit in the front row for three years and never be born again. You can call Him “Rabbi” and never call Him “Lord.”

This is why Jesus said, “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 7:21). He wasn’t warning believers that they could lose their salvation. He was warning that some people who look like believers—who do impressive religious things, who prophesy, cast out demons, and perform wonders—were never His to begin with.

IV. Peter and Judas: Two Sinners, One Difference

If you want to understand the real meaning of Judas’s story, you cannot read it without reading Peter’s story alongside it. The Gospels practically force the comparison. Both men sinned against Jesus on the same night. Both betrayed Him—Judas with a kiss, Peter with a curse. Both were devastated by what they had done.

But one ended in restoration. The other ended in a noose.

The difference was not the severity of the sin. Peter’s denial was vicious—he swore he didn’t know Jesus, not once but three times, in front of witnesses, while Jesus was on trial for His life. By the standards of the religious culture, Peter’s betrayal was arguably worse than Judas’s, because Peter had just sworn he would die for Jesus (Matthew 26:35) and then denied Him hours later.

The difference was not the depth of the sorrow. Judas felt terrible. Matthew 27:3 says he “felt remorse” (NASB) or “repented himself” (KJV). He returned the silver. He confessed to the chief priests: “I have sinned by betraying innocent blood” (Matthew 27:4). These are not the actions of a man who doesn’t care. Judas was clearly in anguish.

So what was the difference?

Direction. Peter ran toward Jesus. Judas ran away from Him.

The Two Greek Words for “Repentance”

This is where the Greek text reveals something that English translations obscure. There are two different Greek words that are both translated “repentance” in English, and the New Testament uses each one with surgical precision.

Metanoia (and its verb form metanoeo): This is the word used fifty-eight times in the New Testament for genuine, saving repentance. It means a fundamental change of mind and direction—a turning of the whole self toward God. It is not primarily about emotion. It is about reorientation. The theologian Kittel defined it as arriving at “a different view” of something that changes how you live. This is the word Jesus uses in Mark 1:15: “Repent and believe the Gospel.” It is a synonym for faith itself—a turning from self-reliance to God-reliance.

Metamelomai: This is the word used in Matthew 27:3 to describe Judas’s response. It appears only six times in the New Testament. It means to feel regret, remorse, or sorrow after the fact. Kittel distinguished it sharply: “In remorse (metamelomai) a man sees the bitter end of sin. In repentance (metanoia) he breaks free from it.” Remorse is self-focused—it grieves the consequences. Repentance is God-focused—it grieves the offense against a holy God and turns toward Him for mercy.

Paul captures this distinction perfectly in 2 Corinthians 7:10:

“For godly sorrow produces repentance leading to salvation, not to be regretted; but the sorrow of the world produces death.” — 2 Corinthians 7:10

Godly sorrow—the kind Peter experienced—produces metanoia, a turning toward God that leads to salvation. Worldly sorrow—the kind Judas experienced—produces death. Literally. Judas’s remorse did not drive him to the feet of Jesus. It drove him to a tree with a rope.

Peter wept bitterly (Luke 22:62). But his weeping drove him back to Jesus. After the resurrection, Peter ran to the empty tomb (John 20:4). He jumped out of a boat and swam to shore when he recognized the risen Lord (John 21:7). He received Jesus’s three-fold restoration—“Do you love Me?” asked three times to heal the three denials (John 21:15–17). Peter’s sorrow was godly because it pushed him toward the only One who could forgive him.

Judas’s sorrow was worldly because it turned him inward. He tried to fix it himself—returning the money, confessing to the priests. When that didn’t work, he destroyed himself. He never went to Jesus. He never asked for mercy. He never turned Godward.

The lesson is not that Peter’s sin was smaller. It is that Peter knew where to take his sin. Judas didn’t—because he had never known Jesus as Savior in the first place.

V. The Timeline Nobody Mentions

Here is a fact that is almost never raised in debates about Judas and eternal security, and it should be front and center: Judas died before the cross.

This matters enormously, and not just as a historical footnote. The New Covenant—the covenant under which believers are sealed, justified, and eternally secured—was not ratified until Jesus said “It is finished” (John 19:30) and rose from the dead three days later. The writer of Hebrews is explicit: “For where a covenant is, there must of necessity be the death of the one who made it. For a covenant is valid only when men are dead, for it is never in force while the one who made it lives” (Hebrews 9:16–17).

Judas lived and died under the Old Covenant. He never experienced Pentecost. He was never indwelt by the Holy Spirit. He was never sealed with the Spirit as a guarantee of inheritance (Ephesians 1:13–14). He was never baptized into the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:13). He was never placed “in Christ”—the phrase Paul uses over 160 times to describe the position of the New Covenant believer.

Using Judas as a proof text against eternal security is like citing a contract that hadn’t been signed yet. The covenant that guarantees the believer’s security was not in force during Judas’s lifetime. To argue that Judas “lost his salvation” under a covenant that didn’t yet exist is not just bad theology—it’s an anachronism.

This does not mean the Old Testament saints were unsaved. It means the mechanism of salvation changed at the cross. Before the cross, believers looked forward in faith to a promised redemption. After the cross, believers look back in faith to a completed redemption. And the New Covenant introduced something the Old Covenant never had: the permanent, irrevocable indwelling of the Holy Spirit as a seal and guarantee.

Judas never had that seal. He couldn’t lose what he never possessed.

VI. What “Eternal” Actually Means

The debate over whether salvation can be lost often ignores the simplest and most obvious argument against it: the word eternal.

“I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of My hand. My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of My Father’s hand.” — John 10:28–29

If salvation can be lost, it is not eternal. If eternal life has an expiration date, it is not eternal. The word in Greek is aionios—it means unending, perpetual, without termination. Jesus does not say “I give them life for as long as they behave.” He says “they shall never perish.” Never. Not “probably not.” Not “as long as they endure.” Never.

And then He adds a double guarantee: they are held in His hand AND in the Father’s hand. No one—no person, no demon, no power, no failure—can pry them loose.

Paul echoes this with absolute clarity:

“For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” — Romans 8:38–39

Read that list carefully. It includes “things present”—which would include your current sin. It includes “things to come”—which would include your future sin. It includes “any other created thing”—which includes you. You are a created thing. You cannot separate yourself from the love of God in Christ.

Does this mean sin doesn’t matter? Absolutely not. We’ll address that. But it means salvation is not contingent on your performance. It is contingent on His faithfulness:

“If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself.” — 2 Timothy 2:13

If your salvation depended on your faithfulness, it would be as fragile as you are. But it depends on His faithfulness—and He cannot fail.

VII. Repentance: The Most Misunderstood Word in the Bible

A massive amount of the confusion in this debate comes from a single English word: repentance. Many Christians have been taught that repentance means “stop sinning.” If you don’t stop sinning, you haven’t truly repented. And if you haven’t truly repented, you’re not truly saved.

This is a works-based gospel dressed in evangelical clothing.

As we discussed in the comparison between Peter and Judas, the primary New Testament word for repentance is metanoia—a change of mind. It means to turn from self-reliance to God-reliance, from trusting in your own righteousness to trusting in Christ’s righteousness. It is the doorway to salvation, and it is essentially synonymous with faith. When Jesus says “Repent and believe” (Mark 1:15), He is not listing two separate requirements. He is describing one movement from two angles: turning away from self (repentance) and turning toward Christ (faith). They are the same turn.

Repentance is not a promise to stop sinning. If it were, no one would qualify, because no one stops sinning completely this side of glory. Repentance is a recognition that you cannot save yourself and a turning toward the One who can. It is a change of mind about who God is, who you are, and what the cross accomplished.

The dangerous teaching—the one that chains people in fear—redefines repentance as ongoing moral performance. Under this framework, every sin becomes evidence that you might not really be saved. Every failure triggers the question: Did I really repent? Am I really a Christian? Maybe I need to get saved again.

This is spiritual slavery. And it is the opposite of what Jesus died to accomplish.

“It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery.” — Galatians 5:1

The people who preach that every sin threatens your salvation are putting believers back under a yoke of law that Christ broke at Calvary. They are preaching the means of salvation—moral effort, behavioral conformity, endurance—rather than the Person of salvation, who is Jesus Christ and Him alone.

VIII. Freedom in Christ: Not a License, but an Invitation

Now let me be equally direct with the other side. If anyone reads the doctrine of eternal salvation and concludes, “Great, I can live however I want,” they have not understood the Gospel at all.

“What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin so that grace may increase? May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it?” — Romans 6:1–2

Paul anticipated this exact objection. And his answer was not “Well, technically yes, but try not to.” His answer was “May it never be!”—the strongest possible negative in Greek. The very idea was repulsive to him.

Here is the truth that both sides often miss: genuine salvation produces transformation. Not because transformation is the condition of salvation, but because transformation is the evidence of it. When the Holy Spirit takes up residence in a human heart, that heart changes. Not perfectly. Not instantly. Not without struggle, failure, and setback. But fundamentally and irreversibly.

A person who has genuinely received Christ will not be comfortable living in unrepentant sin indefinitely—not because their salvation is at risk, but because the Holy Spirit within them will convict, correct, and draw them back. God disciplines His children (Hebrews 12:5–11). He does not abandon them.

This is the critical distinction: the security of the believer does not eliminate the consequences of sin. A believer who persists in sin will experience God’s discipline, damaged relationships, loss of peace, loss of reward, and real suffering. But they will not experience the loss of salvation—because salvation was never earned by their behavior in the first place.

Freedom in Christ is not a license to sin. It is a freedom to come to Jesus without fear. It means that when you fail—and you will fail—you can run to the Father instead of running from Him. You can confess sin without wondering if you’ve been disqualified. You can receive grace without earning it. You can get back up without getting re-saved.

This is what Peter understood that Judas never did. When Peter failed, he knew where to go. He ran to Jesus—not because he deserved restoration, but because he knew Jesus was faithful even when he was not.

Freedom in Christ is the freedom to be honest about your brokenness before a God who already knows it, already paid for it, and already decided to keep you anyway.

IX. The Real Danger: Preaching Performance Instead of the Person

I want to speak plainly here, because this is personal.

When teachers stand before congregations and declare that sin can cost you your salvation, they think they are protecting holiness. What they are actually doing is driving people away from the only One who can make them holy.

Think about it. If every sin potentially cancels your salvation, then the person sitting in the pew who is struggling with addiction, with lust, with anger, with doubt—that person hears: “You might not be saved. You might be a Judas.” And what does that person do? They either pretend to be fine (which produces the very hypocrisy these teachers claim to oppose), or they give up entirely. “If I can’t be good enough, why try?”

This is why the Western church is shrinking while the persecuted church is growing. The Western church has turned salvation into a theological debate—a system of performance metrics where your standing with God rises and falls with your behavior. Meanwhile, in the underground churches of Iran, China, and Nigeria, believers who face prison and death every day have discovered something that comfortable Christians have forgotten: salvation is about a Person, not a performance.

Those believers aren’t asking, “How much can I sin and still be saved?” That question never occurs to someone who might die for their faith tomorrow. They’re asking, “Is Jesus worth dying for?” And the answer—the answer that sustains them through torture, imprisonment, and the loss of everything—is: “Yes. Because He already died for me. And nothing can separate me from His love.”

That is eternal security. Not a doctrine to be debated. A reality to be lived.

No wonder the persecuted church burns with faith while parts of the Western church argue over who’s going to hell. We’re tinkering with the definition of salvation. They’re living it.

X. What Judas Actually Teaches Us

So what does the story of Judas teach us? Not what most people think.

It does not teach that believers can lose their salvation. Judas was never a believer. Jesus said so explicitly, repeatedly, in language that admits no ambiguity.

It does not teach that following Jesus guarantees transformation. You can walk with Jesus for years and never surrender your heart to Him. Proximity is not conversion.

It does not teach that sin disqualifies you from grace. Peter sinned as grievously as Judas and was fully restored—because Peter was genuinely Christ’s, and Christ holds His own.

Here is what Judas does teach us:

Salvation is about the heart. Judas performed every external act of discipleship—he preached, traveled, witnessed miracles, even cast out demons. But his heart was never surrendered. True salvation is an internal, supernatural work of God that transforms a person from the inside out. You cannot fake it forever.

Jesus never stops reaching for the lost. He washed Judas’s feet. He warned Judas at the supper. He called Judas “friend” in the garden (Matthew 26:50). Every one of these was an invitation to turn. Jesus did not reject Judas. Judas rejected Jesus.

Remorse is not repentance. Feeling terrible about sin is not the same as turning to God because of sin. The difference between Judas and Peter was not the depth of their grief. It was the direction of their response. One ran toward Jesus. The other ran to a rope.

The most dangerous spiritual condition is self-deception. Judas fooled eleven men who lived with him daily. He could not fool Jesus. The warning of Judas is not “you might lose your salvation.” The warning is: make sure you have it. Not by measuring your behavior, but by asking yourself: Have I surrendered to the Person of Jesus Christ? Do I trust Him alone for my standing before God? Am I running toward Him or away from Him?

A Final Word

If you are reading this and you have been told that your sin has disqualified you from God’s love, I want you to hear something clearly: that is a lie.

It is not a lie because sin doesn’t matter. Sin matters enormously. It grieves the Holy Spirit. It damages your life and the lives of others. It robs you of the peace and joy that are your inheritance in Christ. God hates sin precisely because He loves you, and sin destroys the things He created for your good.

But the lie is that your sin is bigger than His grace. The lie is that you have to earn your way back. The lie is that you were saved by faith but are kept by works. The lie is that God is in heaven tallying your failures and waiting for the one that pushes you past the point of no return.

“There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.” — Romans 8:1

No condemnation. Not “less condemnation.” Not “condemnation pending your next evaluation.” No condemnation. Now. For those who are in Christ Jesus.

That is not a license to sin. It is a lifeline for sinners. It is the very thing that gives you the courage to come to God with your failures instead of hiding from Him. It is the foundation of the freedom that Christ died to give you.

Judas never understood this. He wanted a kingdom, not a King. He wanted power, not grace. And when his plans fell apart, he had nowhere to go—because he had never known the One who would have received him with open arms, even at the last moment, even after the worst betrayal in human history.

Peter understood it. Imperfectly, brokenly, through tears and shame—but he understood it. And so he ran. Not away. Toward.

That is the invitation of the Gospel. Not to be good enough. Not to endure long enough. Not to perform consistently enough. The invitation is to run—toward Jesus, as you are, with whatever you’ve done—and to discover that He is already running toward you.

Because salvation was never about holding onto God.

It was always about God holding onto you.

Thanks for reading A Walk with Jesus! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?